Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Physiology

Open Access

A theoretical model for estimating the margination constant of leukocytes

  • Kátia Iadocicco1,
  • Luiz Henrique Alves Monteiro2 and
  • José Guilherme Chaui-Berlinck1Email author
BMC Physiology20022:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-2-3

Received: 21 August 2001

Accepted: 05 February 2002

Published: 05 February 2002

Abstract

Background

Blood leukocytes constitute two interchangeable sub-populations, the marginated and circulating pools. These two sub-compartments are found in normal conditions and are potentially affected by non-normal situations, either pathological or physiological. The dynamics between the compartments is governed by rate constants of margination (M) and return to circulation (R). Therefore, estimates of M and R may prove of great importance to a deeper understanding of many conditions. However, there has been a lack of formalism in order to approach such estimates. The few attempts to furnish an estimation of M and R neither rely on clearly stated models that precisely say which rate constant is under estimation nor recognize which factors may influence the estimation.

Results

The returning of the blood pools to a steady-state value after a perturbation (e.g., epinephrine injection) was modeled by a second-order differential equation. This equation has two eigenvalues, related to a fast- and to a slow-component of the dynamics. The model makes it possible to identify that these components are partitioned into three constants: R, M and SB; where SB is a time-invariant exit to tissues rate constant. Three examples of the computations are worked and a tentative estimation of R for mouse monocytes is presented.

Conclusions

This study establishes a firm theoretical basis for the estimation of the rate constants of the dynamics between the blood sub-compartments of white cells. It shows, for the first time, that the estimation must also take into account the exit to tissues rate constant, SB.

Background

Blood leukocytes are found in two sub-populations constituting the circulating and the marginating pools. The elements of these two sub-populations are interchangeable, i.e., marginated leukocytes return to bloodstream and vice-versa [13]. Therefore, a dynamical equilibrium situation occurs, and blood cell counts should reflect the rate constants of margination and return to circulation of those cells.

Several studies addressed the relationships between the sub-populations of white cells within the blood pool. Among other features, the ratio between the sub-populations under normal conditions [4], under altered states [4, 5] and the stability of the equilibrium situation (i.e., to resume a previous value after perturbations, [e.g., [68]) were approached. It is presently accepted that the blood sub-pools play an important role as a white cell reservoir when increased demands supervene. Increased demands arise in both pathological and non-pathological situations, as during exercise [9, 10], burns [11, 12], infectious diseases [13], inflammatory processes [5, 14], etc.. It is also currently recognized that some hormones acutely alter the dynamics of the blood sub-pools of white cells [68]. In this sense, epinephrine is known to possess a demarginating effect that lasts for less than 1 hour, and such an effect is thought to be the result of changes in the rate constants of margination and return [2, 6]. Therefore, the interplay between marginating and circulating leukocytes is a relevant issue that should be taken into account in the interpretation of many results.

On the one hand, it is tacitly assumed that the rate constants of margination and return have higher values than other rate constants related to the dynamics of white blood cells (see below). On the other hand, there is no study addressing such an issue in a formal way in order to provide good estimation of these values. The aim of the present study is to provide the theoretical background to perform estimations of these rate constants, which may prove relevant for empirical studies on healthy normal situations as well as under altered states of the organisms.

Constructing the extensive model

In this sub-section, we present a model based mainly on data from monocytes and neutrophils. The model describes the dynamics of three compartments of these cells and also contains the dynamics of specific growth factors. In the next sub-section we show a reduced model from this one, which will then be employed to obtain an improved estimation for the rate constants values. The extensive model is presented to assure consistence of the analysis.

Bone marrow total rate production apparently has three components: a fixed production rate (P1), a production rate dependent on self-regulatory factors (P2) and a production rate dependent on inflammatory/infectious factors (P(I)) [3]. Therefore, the production rate is not a time independent function, and we denote it by the sum of the three terms above. Once the newly produced cell gains the bloodstream, it may marginate (rate constant M). A marginated cell may then return to circulation (rate constant R). Cells in the blood may leave to surrounding solid tissues, and they do that according to a time-independent rate constant SB[1]. Exit to tissues is also a function of rate constants dependent on inflammatory/infectious factors [3]. Thus, let us denote such a total exit rate constant from the circulation by SB + S(t,I). Tissue leukocytes may proliferate locally (rate constant D), produce self-regulatory factors and, eventually, die (rate constant Z) [15]. This set of empirical data suggests the scheme presented in Figure 1 and the following equation system for describing the dynamics of these cells:
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the dynamics of white cells in the organism. The self-reproduction in tissues is represented by "D", without arrows. Crosses denote death or clearance. See text for details.

Where α are self-regulatory factors (e.g., CSF-1) and φi refers to cells that take part in the circulating (c), marginal (m) and solid-tissues (T) pools. G is a constant related to the production of self-regulatory factors, and K is the rate constant of their clearance. Notice that the exit to tissues comes both from the circulating pool, φc, and from the marginated pool, φm. Such an exit has the same rate constant, SB, independently of the sub-pool. This partition of the total exit constant rate to tissues in two components is the basic reasoning that leads to the inference about the existence of two distinct sub-pools within the blood white cells [1]. Therefore, a cell that touches, attaches and passes through the vessel wall cannot return to the circulating pool, even though during a certain time interval this cell was marginated (semantically but not functionally). In this sense, these cells exit to the surrounding tissues coming directly from the circulating pool, and their dynamics is contemplated by the product φcSB of the differential equation. Those marginated cells that can potentially return to circulation have their dynamics accounted for by the rate constant R. On the other hand, part of these marginated cells migrate to surrounding tissues and the product φmSB contemplates this rate. This dynamics is also consistent to the empirical evidence that margination and diapedesis are distinct features arising from different signals and receptors [16].

Reducing to the compact model

The injection of some substances, epinephrine in particular, changes the rate constants of margination and return to circulation (M and R) for very short periods of time (e.g., see [2, 68]). Under such a condition, the variable values change as the parameter values change. However, since the substance is rapidly metabolized, the parameters return to their previous value and then the variables would also return to some value maintained previously to the perturbation (in the parameters). Thereby, these substances act on the system described by equations 1a-d analogously to an impulsive function [17]. The returning phase is the relaxing period of the system, and it behaves as the perturbation had occurred in the variables instead of in the parameters. During the short time interval of the relaxing period, the production rate can be considered constant, P. Therefore, equations 1a and 1b maintain no loop-connection to the other two equations (1c and 1d), and a compact system can be written as:

Results

Analysis of the steady-state condition

The first step in the analysis was to verify whether the extensive model allows the existence of a stable equilibrium point. An equilibrium point means a set of values of the variables (in this case, φc, φm, φT and α) that does not vary with time (if the system is left externally undisturbed). Stability is related to the behavior of the system in face of perturbations in the variables that displace them to some vicinity of an equilibrium point. The equilibrium point is said asymptotically stable if the system returns to the equilibrium point attained previously. Otherwise, the equilibrium point may be neutrally stable, if the system does not return to the equilibrium point but remains somewhere around it, or unstable, if the system leaves that vicinity away (e.g., [18]).

We verified whether the extensive model posses one asymptotically stable equilibrium point as a first step because the biological system modeled seems to behave like this. Once disturbed, it returns to a previous value. The analysis revealed the existence of one equilibrium point, and such a point is asymptotically stable (see Methods). Let * denote the value of the variable in the equilibrium point. Without loss of generality by considering the inflammatory/infectious factors absent and that φT and α are fixed (e.g., for a short time interval or changes in R or M, see Methods), the equilibrium values of the variables that we are interested in the present study are:

As stated before, blood cell counts should reflect the rate constants of margination and return. Let f* denote the ratio φm*c* and thus:

Notice that one is not able to know, directly from the ratio φm*c*, the values of R and M themselves.

The demarginated state and its return to the equilibrium condition

In a very short time interval succeeding a bolus injection of some substances (e.g., epinephrine) the parameters R and M change and return to their previous values. Therefore, the circulating and marginal pools attain different values from φc* and φm*, respectively. Given the stability of the equilibrium point (see above) these variables return to φc* and φm*. This returning is governed by a second-order differential equation (see Methods). Let be the value attained above (or below) the equilibrium value φc* by the circulating cells after the perturbation (see Methods). In short, (see equation 9). Therefore, taking the equilibrium value of the circulating pool as a reference value, is the difference between this value and the value found at a time t after the beginning of the returning to the steady-state equilibrium condition. This leads to the following equation governing the fast-phase of resuming the steady-state condition:

where φc0 is the peak (or nadir) value of the circulating pool attained after the perturbation, i.e., the initial value of this variable, and λ is the fast component of the process (λ2, see Methods equation 11b). Equation 5 can be linearized to simplify the estimation procedure. Finally, the λ of equation 5 is (see equation 11b):

λ = -(R + SB)(f* + 1)

This value of λ allows a good estimate of R during the fast phase of the returning to the equilibrium point (steady-state of the sub-pools). In the next section, we will work some examples of the application of the present model and its potential relevance.

Worked examples

The present study offers the means to compute the individual values of R and M. As stated before, the ratio f* is obtained by measuring the marginated and the circulating pools in steady-state conditions. This ratio is equal to M/(R+SB) (see equation 4). Therefore, its is important to note that the individual computation of R (and M) assumes that a series of other independent measurements were done: (a) φc* (the steady-state value of the circulating pool); (b) φm* (the steady-state value of the marginated pool); (c) SB (the exit rate constant from the total blood pool to tissues). The knowledge of a general production rate value may also improve the picture, even though its is not a primary need.

The first example intends to compute the R value for mice monocytes under normal conditions. However, the paucity of adequate data prevents a true computation. Therefore, we will compute an approximate value. The other two examples are completely imaginary. They show the usefulness of the model to address changes in the rate constants that would otherwise pass unnoticed.

I. The normal condition

The computations are based on data from van Furth and Sluiter [1]. The report give φc* = 350 monocytes/mm3, φm* = 500 monocytes/mm3 and SB = 9.6 × 10-4 min-1. The f* value is 500/350 = 1.43. An intravenous bolus injection of epinephrine caused a two-fold increase in φc after 10 minutes of the injection. Therefore, (or, φc(0) = 700). After 60 minutes from the injection time (50 minutes after the monocytes peak), the variables resume their normal values. Notice the extremely limited temporal data. Let us suppose that we had a few more points, as illustrated in Figure 2A. From equation 5, the data could be linearized as:
Figure 2

Simulated perturbation in the blood sub-pools of a white cell type (e.g., monocytes) under three different conditions: normal (blue), tumor carrying animal (red), long-term aerobic exercising animal (green); see text for details. (A) "Raw experimental data", the "discrete" time course of φc after a bolus injection of epinephrine under the normal condition. (B) Log-transformed (linearized) data, under the three different conditions. Notice the linear relationship obtained. (C) "Raw "continuous" data" of the φc time course. Data generated in MatLab 5.3 (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) by built-in numerical integration routines of the set of differential equations of the model.

Where T is the discrete sampling time. Figure 2B shows the result of the linearization procedure. A linear regression would then result in λ = -0.113 min-1. Finally, from equation 6, we know that this value must be decomposed as

-0.113 = -(R + SB)(1 + f*)

Thus, R = 0.0456 min-1, a value 47-fold greater than SB. In the data simulation, R = 0.045 min-1, therefore the procedure seems quite adequate. This example highlights the use of the present model as well as the difference between the eigenvalue (λ, obtained directly from the data) and the constant R. Also, as far as we know, this is the first attempt to estimate the value of R (and M) under a complete and formal model.

II. Tumoral effects

Consider, as another example, that mice carrying a certain tumor type have the exit constant rate equal to the normal value (SB = 9.6 × 10-4 min-1). The f* value is 1.3 and these mice have φc* = 490 monocytes/mm3, φm* = 637 monocytes/mm3. Obviously, production rate have increased. Notice the potential confusing situation arising from these data. Does the tumor growth alter the dynamics between the blood pools? The epinephrine experiment (or some analogue) was conducted, and (or, φc(0) = 600). Figure 2C shows both the "normal" and the "tumoral" data. Linear regression of the log-transformed data computes λ = -0.065 min-1 (see Figure 2B) and thus R = 0.0273 min-1 since f* = 1.3. In data simulation, R = 0.027 min-1, again the results are in close agreement with the real parameter value. Therefore, in this constructed situation, one would be able to conclude that the rate constants of the transit between the blood pool were altered by the pathological condition. This could be an important result in tumor immunology, for example, allowing a better understanding of the pathology or devising new treatment strategies.

III. Long Distance Running Effects

Our final imaginary example is related to the effects of long sustained aerobic exercise. Consider that mice trained in this type of exercise are known to have increased production rate of monocytes. During the steady-state condition of the exercise, φc* = 350 monocytes/mm3, φm* = 700 monocytes/mm3, thus f* = 2. SB increased to 8.5 × 10-3 min-1. An epinephrine experiment is performed during the exercise section and samples are taken during the decaying phase after the injection (the exercise section proceeds during the sampling period). The "continuos" count profile is illustrated in Figure 2C. Linear regression of the log-transformed data (see Figure 2B) computes λ = -0.041 min-1 and thus R = 0.0052 min-1 (in data simulation, R = 0.005 min-1). This is a 9-fold decrease in the R value in relationship to the normal condition. On the other hand, the rate constant M decreased less than 2.5 times in relationship to its value in normal conditions (see above). This result might be important in the understanding of many immune suppression/enhancement phenomena related to certain exercise protocols. Notice that the f* value by itself do not tell anything about the change in the individual value of each rate constant.

Discussion

The compartmentalization of blood leukocytes in two sub-pools is an important feature of these cells. For example, the marginal pool may acutely function as an extra source of cells at increased demand conditions. In this sense, knowledge about the rate constants governing the transit between the sub-pools may prove relevant in studies that approach both physiological and pathological situations. In the present manuscript we provide the theoretical background to support empirical studies related to the calculation of these rate constants.

From the general perspective of an extensive model, we first showed that this model corresponds to what is experimentally found in terms of existence and stability of an equilibrium point in the variables (the sub-pools). After that, we reduced the model to a compact one, concerning only the two blood sub-pools of interest here. Within the context of the compact model, it was shown how an impulsive function (e.g., an intravenous epinephrine bolus injection) perturbing the parameters (the rate constants of margination and return to circulation) can be translated to a perturbation in the variables. Then, the returning of the variables to their equilibrium values allows the estimation of the rate constants. This was done by the use of a second-order differential equation (see Methods). From that equation, the fast-decay component was identified and the corresponding eigenvalue contains the rate constants to be calculated.

The present study demonstrates, for the first time, how to adequately and completely estimate the rate constants of margination and return to circulation of white blood cells. Notice that first-order differential equations (as equation 5) were employed before in gross estimates of these rate constants (e.g., [19]). However, the constant then computed comprised the whole eigenvalue, without discriminating its parts. In other words, its was not recognized that the computed value should be partitioned into three components: R, M and SB.

The model also allows to establish the relationship between R and M. This relationship includes the SB constant and the ratio between the marginal and the circulating sub-pools, f* (see equation 4). The need to take into account the f* value in the estimation of the constants is another important aspect for the first time presented. Therefore, the model leads to a more precise evaluation on how imposed disturbances interfere with the dynamics of the blood sub-compartments and thus increase our understanding of the physiology/pathophysiology of many conditions. Two imaginary situations of this kind were constructed and analyzed as examples of the use of the present model (see "Worked Examples" II and III).

Conclusions

This study provides a complete model to approach the estimation of rate constants of margination and return to circulation of with blood cells. It shows, for the first time, how the value empirically found should be partitioned in order to adequately obtain the desired rate constants. In this sense, we were able to recognize that both an exit rate constant to tissues and the ratio between marginated and circulating cells should be taken into account in the computation procedure.

Methods

1. Equilibrium point and its stability

The equilibrium point of the system described by equations 1a-d is found by setting all the derivatives to zero and computing the corresponding values of the variables that lead to such a condition. Without loss of generality, the inflammatory/infectious factors can be taken as zero. Therefore, the equilibrium point (denoted by *) corresponds to the following values:

Conditions of existence: (1) Z > D; and (2) K(Z-D) > P2G. The first condition reflects that tissue leukocytes must die at a rate higher than their own local replication otherwise their population would increase forever. The second condition is similar to the first in the sense that it reflects that the self-stimulatory loop must be lower than the loss loop of the system.

The stability of the equilibrium point is verified by the construction of the determinant of the matrix of the coefficients of the variables of the equations of the system [17, 18, 20]. In order to be asymptotically stable, all the eigenvalues (roots) of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix must have real parts lower than zero. Considering that the system has four equations, the characteristic polynomial is of the 4th-order with the following general formula:

λ4 + a1λ3 + a2λ2 + a3λ + a4 = 0

where λ is an eigenvalue of the equation (note that the equation has 4 roots). The coefficients (ai) come from the parameters of the system. To have all the eigenvalues with real part lower than zero, the Routh-Hurwitz conditions must verify. In short:

1A. All ai must be greater than zero. This condition is true for the system.

1B. a1a2 > a3. This condition is true for the system.

1C. a3(a1a2 - a3) > a4a12. This condition is not easily verified analytically. Therefore, we performed a numerical analysis. Random values were assigned to the parameters (conditions of existence of the equilibrium point verified, see above) and the condition 1C checked (pseudo-random number generator normally distributed built-in function of MatLab 5.3, The MathWorks, Natick MA). This procedure was taken 150,000 times by a routine specifically written for it and the condition always verified true. Therefore, the equilibrium point seems asymptotically stable.

The main point in this sub-section is to realize that both φT* and α* are not affected by R and/or M. This is what assures the results concerning the compact model below.

2. The compact model and its second-order differential equation form

Considering that production rate and inflammatory/infectious factors would not change in a short time interval, the extensive model allows the blood pool to be treated as having no loop connection to the rest of the system (see equations 2a and 2b). The determinant of the Jacobian matrix of the compact model (i.e., the sub-system represented by equations 2a and 2b) is to set to zero:

Consider now a "push" in φc* (and φm*) in such a way that:

is, therefore, the time course of the perturbation around the equilibrium point of φc. Equation 8 is homogeneous for :

Taking into account that M = (R + SB)f* (see equation 4), the eigenvalues of equation 10 are:

Notice that: (a) both eigenvalues are pure real (this means that the equilibrium point is attained without oscillations in the variables); and (b) both eigenvalues are negative (the equilibrium point is asymptotically stable). Given that λ2 < λ1, λ2 is the fast component of the process of resuming the equilibrium value φc* (see sub-section "the demarginated state and its return to the equilibrium condition"). The value of λ2 is -(R + SB)(f* + 1). This value is presented in equation 6.

List of abbreviations

φc

the number of cells (or concentration) in the circulating pool

φm

the number of cells (or concentration) in the marginal pool

φT

the number of cells (or concentration) in solid tissues

α: 

quantity (or concentration) of self-regulatory factors

R: 

rate constant of return to circulation

M: 

rate constant of margination

SB

rate constant of exit to tissues from the blood pool

P: 

bone marrow production rate of the cells

f*

the ratio between the marginal and the circulating pools at steady-state condition.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a FAPESP (State of São Paulo Science Foundation) undergraduate fellowship to K.I. (process number 00/01112-7) and by a FAPESP research grant to J.G.C.B. (process number 00/02287-5).

This manuscript was significantly improved by the comments of two anonymous referees.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Pós-Graduação, Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

References

  1. van Furth R, Sluiter W: Distribution of blood monocytes between a marginating and a circulating pool. J Exp Med. 1986, 163: 474-479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkow RL, Dodson RW: Functional analysis of the marginating pool of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Am J Hematol. 1987, 24: 47-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. van Furth R: Development and Distribution of Mononuclear Phagocytes. In: Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates. Edited by: JI Gallin, IM Goldstein, R Snyderman. 1992, New York, Raven Press, 325-339. 2Google Scholar
  4. Meuret G, Hoffmann G: Monocyte kinetc studies in normal and disease states. Br J Haematol. 1973, 24: 275-285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Furth R, Dulk M, Mattie H: Quantitative study on the production and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes during an acute inflammatory reaction. J Exp Med. 1973, 138: 474-479.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fehr J, Grossmann HC: Disparity between circulating and marginated neutrophils: evidence from studies on the granulocyte alkaline phosphatase, a marker of cell maturity. Am J Hematol. 1979, 7: 369-379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Okada Y, Kawagishi M, Kusaka M: Neutrophil kinetics of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced neutropenia in rats. Life Sci. 1990, 47: PL/65-70. 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90206-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ulich TR, Castillo J, McNiece I, Watson L, Yin S, Andresen J: Hematologic effects of recombinat murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on the peripheral blood and bone marrow. Am J Phatol. 1990, 137: 369-376.Google Scholar
  9. Mackinnon LT: Immunity in athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1997, suppl 1: s62-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pedersen BK, Hoffman-Goetz L: Exercise and the immune system: regulation, integration and adaptation. Physiological Reviews. 2000, 80: 1055-1081.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong YL, Abdulllah K, Yan TZ, Rutan T, Broemeling L, Robson M, Herndon DN, Waymack JP: Effects of thermal injury and sepsis on neutrophil function. J Trauma. 1993, 34: 417-421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Santangelo S, Gamelli RL, Shankar R: Myeloid commitment shifts toward monocytopoiesis after thermal injury and sepsis. Ann Surg. 2001, 233: 97-106. 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00015.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wing EJ, Waheed A, Shadduck RK: Changes in serum Colony-Stimulating Factor and monocytic progenitor cells during Listeria monocytogenes infection in mice. Infect Immun. 1984, 45: 180-184.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sluiter W, Elzenga-Claasen I, Andel AV, van Furth R: Differences in the response of inbred mouse strain to the factor increasing monocytopoiesis. J Exp Med. 1984, 159: 524-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartocci A, Mastrogiannis DS, Migliorati G, Stockert RJ, Wolkoff AW, Stanley ER: Macrophages specifically regulate the concentration of their own growth factor in the circulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 6179-6183.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Colditz IG: Margination and emigration of leukocytes. Surv Synth Pathol Res. 1985, 4: 44-68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boyce WE, DiPrima RC: Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997, Portuguese edition, 6Google Scholar
  18. Strogatz SH: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Reading,. Addison-Wesley. 1994Google Scholar
  19. Martin BA, Wright JT, Thommasen H, Hogg JC: Effects of pulmonary blood flow on the exchange between the circulating and marginating pool of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in dog lungs. J Clin Invest. 1982, 69: 1277-1285.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Murray JD: Mathematical Biology. Berlin. 1989, Springer-Verlag, 2Google Scholar

Copyright

© Iadocicco et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement