Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Physiology

Open Access

Activation of the kinin system in the ovary during ovulation: Role of endogenous progesterone

  • Darrell W Brann1Email author,
  • Lowell M Greenbaum2,
  • Virendra B Mahesh3 and
  • XiaoXing Gao4
BMC Physiology20022:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-2-7

Received: 18 February 2002

Accepted: 29 April 2002

Published: 29 April 2002

Abstract

Background

Previous work by our group and others has implicated a role for kinins in the ovulatory process. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate whether endogenous progesterone, which is an intraovarian regulator of ovulation, might be responsible for induction of the kinin system in the ovary during ovulation. The gonadotropin-primed immature rat was used as the experimental model, and the role of endogenous progesterone was explored using the antiprogestin, RU486.

Results

The results of the study revealed that RU486 treatment, as expected, significantly attenuated ovulation. Activity of the kinin-generating enzyme, kallikrein, was elevated in the ovary in control animals prior to ovulation with peak values observed at 4 h post hCG, only to fall to low levels at 10 h, with a recovery at 20 h post hCG. RU486 treatment had no significant effect on ovarian kallikrein activity as compared to the control group. Total ovarian kininogen levels in control animals increased significantly at 12–14 h after hCG – coinciding with initiation of ovulation. Thereafter, ovarian kininogen levels fell to low levels at 20 h, only to show a rebound from 24–38 h post-hCG. RU486 treatment had no significant effect on the rise of total ovarian kininogen levels from 12–14 h after hCG; however, from 30–40 h post hCG, RU486-treated animals had significantly higher total ovarian kininogen levels versus control animals, suggesting that endogenous progesterone may act to restrain elevations of kininogens in the post-ovulatory ovary. This robust elevation of ovarian kininogen levels by RU486 was found to be primarily due to an increase in T-kininogen, which is a potent cysteine protease inhibitor.

Conclusions

Taken as a whole, these results suggest that endogenous progesterone does not regulate kallikrein activity or kininogens prior to ovulation, but may provide a restraining effect on T-kininogen levels in the post-ovulatory ovary.

Background

The kininogen-kallikrein-kinin system is well established to be important in inflammatory processes due to its actions to induce vasodilation, prostaglandin biosynthesis, and tissue remodeling through regulation of proteases [13]. There are two types of kinins, B-kinin and T-kinin, which are products of cleavage of the substrates B-kininogen and T-kininogen, respectively [[1, 2], for review]. The enzyme kallikrein cleaves B-kininogen to B-kinin, while the enzyme T-kininogenase cleaves T-kininogen to T-kinin [3, 4]. B-kinin and T-kinin have similar vasodilation and prostaglandin regulatory actions, and are metabolized by the enzyme, angiotensin-converting enzyme [1, 2]. T-kininogen, in addition to being a substrate for T-kinin production, is a potent cysteine protease inhibitor and has a role in tissue remodeling [5, 6].

Due to its role in inflammatory processes and tissue remodeling functions, a number of investigators have focused on the kinin system as a possible important mediator in the ovulatory process. Along these lines, our group and others have demonstrated that kallikrein activity and kininogen levels in the ovary increase preceding and at the time of ovulation in the gonadotropin-primed immature rat [79]. A functional role for this activation of the kinin system was suggested by the fact that kinin agonists have been shown to induce ovulation, while conversely; kinin antagonists inhibit ovulation [10, 11]. Additionally, work by Holland et. al. has shown that kallikrein (rKLK-1) gene expression increases in the ovary preceding ovulation [9]. While evidence is mounting supporting a role for the kinin system in ovulation, the precise regulators of this system in the ovary remains unclear. In our previous study, we noticed that the elevation of kallikrein activity and kininogens in the ovary preceding and during ovulation was paralleled by an increase in ovarian progesterone concentrations [7]. Since progesterone has been demonstrated to be an important intraovarian regulator of the ovulatory process [12, 13], the aim of the present study was to determine whether endogenous progesterone is responsible for activation of the kinin system in the ovary during ovulation. The potent antiprogestin compound, RU486 was used to accomplish this aim.

Results

As shown in Figure 1, PMSG-hCG induced ovulation in control rats with peak ova released from the ovary from 24 h to 34 h after hCG administration. RU486 treatment significantly inhibited ovulation at 20 h and 30 h (p < 0.03) versus controls. Ovulation also appeared lower in RU486 -treated rats at 24 and 34 h after hCG as compared to controls; however, due to variability this effect was not significant at these time points. Ovarian estradiol levels in control rats were high at 0 h only to fall to basal levels from 10 h to 38 h (Fig. 2). RU486 treatment caused a slight but significant elevation in ovarian estradiol levels at 30 h compared to control rats (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, even at this time point, ovarian estradiol levels were close to basal levels. Ovarian progesterone levels rose rapidly to reach a peak at 12 h in control animals, followed by a fall at 20 h to 38 h to low levels which, however, were still higher than the initial 0 h levels (Fig 2). RU486-treated rats had significantly attenuated peak progesterone levels at 12 h compared to control animals (p < 0.01). Figure 3 demonstrates that ovarian kallikrein activity in control rats was elevated prior to ovulation with peak values at 4 h, only to fall to low levels at 10 h, with a recovery at 20 h. RU486 treatment had no significant effect on ovarian kallikrein activity as compared to controls. As shown in Figure 4, ovarian total kininogen levels in control animals rose in a gradual manner from 0 h to 12 h to reach peak levels at 12 h, a time that coincides with the beginning of ovulation. Kininogen levels then fell to low levels at 20 h only to show a rebound from 24 to 38 h. RU486 treatment had no effect on the rise of ovarian total kininogen levels from 0 to 10 h; however, from 30–38 h RU486-treated rats had significantly elevated ovarian total kininogen levels compared to control rats (Fig 4). As illustrated in Figure 5, T-kininogen is the major type of kininogen in the postovulatory ovary and the elevation of total kininogen levels by RU486 from 30–38 h was primarily due to an elevation of T-kininogen levels at all time points. B-kininogen levels, on the other hand, did show a small but significant decrease at 30 h, followed by a significant increase at 34 h in RU486-treated rats versus controls.
Figure 1

Effect of the antiprogestin RU486 upon ovulation rate in PMSG-hCG-primed immature rats. Twenty-three-day-old female rats were primed with 10 IU of PMSG and 48 h later ovulation was induced with hCG (10 IU). Either vehicle or RU486 (10 mg/kg) was administered 30 minutes prior to hCG. n = 6 rats per group. ** p < 0.03 vs. vehicle.

Figure 2

Effect of RU486 on ovarian steroid levels in the PMSG-hCG-primed immature rat. The model is the same as described in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle; ** P < 0.01 vs. Vehicle.

Figure 3

Effect of RU486 on ovarian kallikrein activity in the PMSG-hCG-primed immature rat. The model is the same as described in Figure 1. There is no statistical difference between the groups.

Figure 4

Effect of RU486 on total ovarian kininogen levels in the PMSG-hCG-primed immature rat. The model is the same as described in Figure 1. * p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle; ** p < 0.01 vs. Vehicle.

Figure 5

Species of kininogens in the ovary after RU486 treatment in the PMSG-hCG-primed immature rat. The model is the same as described in Figure 1. *p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle; ** p < 0.01 vs. Vehicle.

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that treatment with the antiprogestin compound, RU486, significantly attenuates ovulation in PMSG-hCG-treated immature rats. This finding is in agreement with previous reports in the literature and is consistent with the hypothesis that progesterone has a direct role in ovulation [12, 14]. Along these lines, the progesterone receptor knockout mouse has been shown to develop follicles to the ovulatory stage, but follicle rupture does not occur in these animals despite administration of a superovulatory dose of exogenous gonadotropins [12]. The precise genes/proteins regulated by progesterone in the ovary to modulate ovulation remains unclear. This study investigated the possible role that endogenous progesterone may have in regulation of the kinin system, which has been implicated as a mediator of the ovulatory process. Several interesting observations were yielded by the study. First, even though ovulation was lowered by RU486 treatment, activation of the kinin system as reflected by the elevation in ovarian kallikrein activity and kininogen levels prior to and during ovulation was not significantly affected. This suggests that progesterone may not be responsible for the elevation in kinin system activity in the ovary observed prior to and at the time of ovulation, and that progesterone's modulatory influence in the ovulatory process may be mediated through some system other than the kinin system. Our finding of a lack of significant effect of RU486 on ovarian kallikrein activity during ovulation is somewhat at variance with the report of Tanaka et al. [15]. These investigators suggested a role for progesterone in the regulation of ovarian kallikrein activity based on studies using epostane, a progesterone synthesis inhibitor. In these studies, epostane treatment inhibited ovulation and ovarian kallikrein activity. It should be pointed out however that epostane, in addition to inhibiting progesterone synthesis, has also been shown to strongly inhibit synthesis of 17β-estradiol, testosterone and 4-androstene-3,17-dione in the gonadotropin-stimulated immature rat ovary, so it is not truly specific for inhibition of progesterone synthesis [16]. It should also be pointed out that the temporal pattern for elevation of kallikrein activity differs between the two groups. We see an early peak elevation from 0–4 h followed by a fall to low levels at 10 h and another smaller increase at 10–12 h. Tanaka et. al. see no early increase and their peak levels occur at 12–14 h post-hCG. These differences may reflect different assay specificities as the chromogenic substrates used in their study (D-Val-Leu-Arg-paranitroanilide) and ours (Pro-Phe-Arg-methyl-coumarylamide) are different. The substrate differences could be important because different kallikreins have been shown to have different substrate specificity [17]. The rat kallikrein gene family consists of 13 genes, of which six are expressed in the ovary (rKLK1, rKLK3, rKLK7, rKLK8, rKLK9 and rKLK12) [9]. In an attempt to explain the disparate temporal pattern between the two groups, Holland et. al. examined the gene expression pattern of all six kallikrein genes in the ovary in the same gonadotropin-primed immature rat model used by both groups. They found that only one gene is increased prior to ovulation, rKLK1 or true kallikrein [9]. They also noted that the pattern of gene expression for rKLK1 mirrored the temporal pattern for kallikrein activity observed in our study rather than that reported by Tanaka et. al. (e.g. it was elevated from 0–2 h after hCG) [9]. This led the authors to suggest that our substrate, Pro-Phe-Arg-methyl-coumarylamide is a more specific substrate and is detecting true rKLK1 enzyme activity. We cannot rule out the possibility that the activity of another kallikrein isoform, which is more specifically recognized by the substrate used by Tanaka et. al., changes after hCG, which could explain the temporal pattern observed by Tanaka et. al. and the apparent progesterone regulation they observed. However, Holland et. al. did not find any other kallikrein gene elevation prior to ovulation which would support this possibility [9]. Finally, we did not assess for changes in one other component of the kinin system, the bradykinin receptor. The bradykinin B2 receptor has been demonstrated to be localized in the ovary in theca and granulosa cells [18], and thus regulation by progesterone at this level of the kinin signaling system could be possible and cannot be excluded.

A second interesting observation from our study was that in the post-ovulatory ovary, endogenous progesterone might actually be acting to restrain kininogen elevations. This suggestion is based on the finding that after ovulation, RU486-treated rats exhibited a significant robust elevation of total ovarian kininogen levels as compared to control animals. This elevation was principally due to a RU486-induced increase in T-kininogen levels in the ovary at 30–38 h post hCG. While the function of T-kininogen in the post-ovulatory ovary is not known, T-kininogen can be cleaved to yield the vasodilatory compound, T-kinin, and in its uncleaved state, it is a potent cysteine protease inhibitor [1, 2, 5, 6]. An important class of cysteine proteases in the ovary that T-kininogen may regulate is cathepsins. Cathepsins degrade type I and IV collagen, fibronectin and laminin, and have been implicated to play a role in stimulation of steroidogenesis and degradation of extracellular matrix – events that would be occurring in the post-ovulatory ovary as the corpus luteum is forming [13, 1720]. In support of a possible cathepsin cysteine protease regulatory function for T-kininogen in the ovary, we previously reported that a strong inverse correlation exists between T-kininogen levels and cathepsin activity in the gonadotropin-stimulated immature rat ovary (e.g. as T-kininogen levels increased, cathepsin activity decreased) [7]. We believe that T-kininogen is primarily serving a cysteine protease regulatory function in the ovary, as we have been unable to detect T-kininogenase, the enzyme that cleaves T-kininogen to T-kinin, in the ovary [7].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the current results do not provide support for a role for endogenous progesterone in activation of the kallikrein-kinin system in the ovary preceding ovulation. Thus, progesterone modulation of ovulation most likely is mediated by a system other than the kinin system. Intriguingly, the results suggest that endogenous progesterone may actually be more important in regulating the kinin system in the post-ovulatory ovary. Of significant interest, this post-ovulatory regulation was not observed on kallikrein activity and only minor effects were observed on B-kininogen, which together represent the classical kinin pathway. Rather, the effect was observed specifically on the newest member of the kinin/kininogen family, T-kininogen. Since we have been unable to detect T-kininogenase activity in the ovary, we believe that T-kininogen is functioning primarily as a cysteine protease inhibitor in the ovary. Thus, endogenous progesterone restrainment of T-kininogen in the post-ovulatory ovary could be a mechanism for modulation of cysteine protease activity in the post-ovulatory ovary, thereby facilitating the extensive tissue remodeling that is known to occur after ovulation. Additional studies are underway in our laboratory to further explore this possibility.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Immature 23-day-old female Sprague Dawley rats (Holtzman, Madison, WI) were given PMSG at 0800 h. Forty-eight hours later, the animals were given hCG (10 IU, s.c. in saline; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to induce ovulation. Thirty minutes prior to hCG injection, either vehicle or the antiprogestin RU486 (10 mg/kg in ethylene glycol ip; Roussel UCLAF, Romanville, France) was administered. In the PMSG-hCG induction model, mature follicles first begin to ovulate at 12–15 h, with peak number of ova appearing in the oviducts at 24–30 h [7]. To access the role of the kinin system in the ovulatory process, groups of animals were killed at various time points after hCG treatment; the ovaries were removed to determine ovulation and to measure the various components of the kininogen-kallikrein-kinin system. After removal, the ovaries were cleaned of fat, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -70°C until the various assays were performed. All protocols involving animal use in this study were approved by our Institutional committee for the care and use of animals in research (CAURE).

Determination of ovulation

To determine ovulation, the animals were killed by decapitation and the oviducts were removed, pressed between two microscope slides, and examined under a microscope for the presence of ova as described previously [7].

Preparation of Tissue Homogenate

Ovaries excised from each animal were homogenized using a Dyna-Mix (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) in 400 μl of 50 mM ice-cold PBS, pH 7.4. The homogenates were centrifuged at 4°C at 20,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatants were then assayed as described below.

Determination of Kininogens

Measurements of kininogen levels were performed as described previously by our laboratory using the protocols described by Barlas et al. [7, 21]. Total kininogens. Plasma (100 μl) or tissue homogenate (100 μl) was incubated with 900 μl of 0.03 N HCl at 37°C for 15 min to destroy kininase activity. After neutralization with 25 μl of 1 M NaOH, 25 μl of 5 mg/ml trypsin was added (final concentration of trypsin was 1 mg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h to liberate kinins from the kininogens. The reaction was stopped by heating at 100°C for 10 min. The liberated kinins were quantified according to the RIA method of Greenbaum and Okamoto [2]. An aliquot of the sample (100 μl) was incubated at 4°C with 400 μl of 125I-labeled bradykinin (BK) and 100 μl of BK polycolonal antibodies, which were raised from the rabbit and able to recognize all kinins. After 2–24 h, 1% of bovine gamma globulin and 25% polyethylene glycol were added, respectively, to separate bound and free kinins. Radioactivity was counted by a gamma counter. Total kininogen was expressed as μg/mg protein of BK equivalents.

T-kininogen

After trypsin digestion, plasma was treated with an equal volume of 30 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The supernatant, after centrifugation for 10 min at 3,000 rpm, was applied to a C-18 extraction column previously primed with 5 ml methanol and 5 ml of 1% TFA. After an initial wash with 1% TFA, the kinins were eluted with 1.5 ml of 50% acetonitrile in 1 % TFA. The elute was evaporated to dryness on a Speed Vac centrifuge, redissolved in 40 μl of distilled water, and applied to an HPLC column equilibrated with a mixture of 18% acetonitrile and 82% triethylammonium formate (v/v), pH 4.0. Fractions (14 ml/2 min) were collected and subjected to RIA. T-kinin (μg kinin equiv./mg protein) = [Total kinins released by trypsin] × % T-kinin in total kinin eluted. BK-kininogen was estimated by subtracting the amounts of T-kinin released from T-kininogen by trypsin from the amount of kinins released for total kininogen.

Assay of Kallikrein

Kallikrein activity was measured as described previously by our laboratory [7, 22]. Briefly, tissue homogenate was incubated with a substrate, Pro-Phe-Arg-methylcoumarylamide (MCA), in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl., pH 8.0. The initial hydrolysis of the substrate for the first 5 min is recorded. One unit of enzyme activity of kallikrein releases amino methylcoumarin (AMC) from the substrate at a rate of 1 nM/5 min. The hydrolysis of AMC was measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer with excitation at 370 nm and emission at 460 nm.

Statistical Analysis

The results given in the text are expressed as means ± SEM. Six rats were used per group and the experiments were repeated three times. The differences between experimental groups were analyzed using the student t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mrs. Jannie J. Jones for skillful technical assistance. This work was supported by a research grant (11-16-04-3013-66) from the Medical College of Georgia Research Institute.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neurobiology Program, Department of Neurology, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics
(2)
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Georgia
(3)
Department of Physiology, Medical College of Georgia
(4)
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia

References

  1. Bhoola KD, Figueroa CD, Worthy K: Bioregulation of kinins, kallikreins, kininogens and kinases. Pharmacol Rev. 1992, 44: 1-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenbaum LM, H Okamoto: T-kinin and T-kininogen. Methods Enzymol. 1988, 163: 272-282. 10.1016/0076-6879(88)63026-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clements JA: The glandular kallikrein family of enzymes: tissue specific expression and hormonal regulation. Endocrine Rev. 1989, 10: 393-419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Okamoto H, Greenbaum LM: Pharmacological properties of T-kinin. Biochem Pharmacol. 1983, 32: 2637-2638. 10.1016/0006-2952(83)90039-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moreau T, Esnard F, Gutman N, Degand P, Gauthier F: Cysteine-proteinase-inhibiting function of T-kininogen and of its proteolytic fragments. Eur J Biochem. 1988, 173: 185-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Torres C, Li M, Walter R, Sierra F: Modulation of the ERK pathway of signal transduction by cysteine proteinase inhibitors. J Cell Biochem. 2000, 80: 11-23. 10.1002/1097-4644(20010101)80:1<11::AID-JCB20>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao XX, Greenbaum LM, Mahesh VB, Brann DW: Characterization of the kinin system in the ovary during ovulation in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1992, 47: 945-951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Espey LL, Miller DH, Margolius HS: Ovarian increase in kinin-generating capacity in PMSG/hCG-primed immature rat. Am J Physiol. 1986, 251: E362-E365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Holland AM, Findlay JK, Clements JA: Kallikrein gene expression in the gonadotropin-stimulated rat ovary. J Endocrinology. 2001, 170: 243-250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hellberg P, Larson L, Olofsson J, Hedin L, Brännström M: Stimulatory effects of bradykinin on the ovulatory process in the in vitro – perfused rat ovary. Biol Reprod. 1991, 44: 269-274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yoshimura Y, Espey LL, Hosoi Y, Adachi E, Atlas S, Ghodgaonkar R, Dubin N, Wallach E: The effects of bradykinin on ovulation and prostaglandin production in the perfused rabbit ovary. Endocrinology. 1988, 122: 2540-2546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lydon JP, De Mayo F, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery CA, Shyamala G, Coneely O, O'Malley BW: Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 2266-2278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Robker R, Russell DL, Yoshioka S, Sharma SC, Lydon JP, O'Malley BW, Epsey L, Richards JS: Ovulation: a multi-gene, multi-step process. Steroids. 2000, 65: 559-570. 10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00114-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coneely OM, Mulac-Jericevic J, Lydon JP, De Mayo FJ: Reproductive functions of the progesterone receptor isoforms: lessons from knock-out mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001, 179: 97-103. 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00465-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tanaka N, Espey LL, Stacy SS, Okamura H: Epostane and indomethacin actions on ovarian kallikrein and plasminogen activator activities during ovulation in the gonadotropin-primed immature rat. Biol Reprod. 1992, 46: 665-620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Espey LL, Tanaka N, Adams RF, Okamura H: Ovarian hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids compared with prostanoids and steroids during ovulation in rats. Am J Physiol. 1991, 260: E163-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier F, Moreau T, Gutman N, el Moujahed A, Brillard-Bourdet M: Functional diversity of proteinases encoded by genes of the rat tissue kallikrein family. Agents Actions Suppl. 1992, 38: 42-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura A, Kihara T, Ohkura R, Ogiwara K, Takahashi T: Localization of bradykinin B(2) receptor in the follicles of porcine ovary and increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-3 and -20 in cultured granulosa cells by bradykinin treatment. Biol Reprod. 2001, 65: 1462-1470.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Turk B, Turk V, Turk D: Structural and functional aspects of papain-like cysteine proteinases and their protein inhibitors. Biol Chem. 1997, 378: 141-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Oksjoki S, Soderstrom M, Vuorio E, Anttila L: Differential expression patterns of cathepsins B, H, K, L and S in the mouse ovary. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001, 7: 27-34. 10.1093/molehr/7.1.27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Barlas A, Okamoto H, Greenbaum LM: T-kininogen – the major plasma kininogen in rat adjuvant arthritis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985, 129: 280-286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kato K, Adachi N, Iwanaga S, Abe K, Takada K, Kimura T, Sakakibara S: A new fluorogenic substrate method for the estimation of kallikrein in urine. J Biochem. 1980, 87: 1127-1132.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement