Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Trimester-specific thyroid hormone reference ranges in Sudanese women

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 3Email author
BMC PhysiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12899-016-0025-0

©  The Author(s). 2016

  • Received: 24 May 2016
  • Accepted: 13 October 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Trimester-specific reference ranges for T3, T4, and TSH need to be established in different communities. Neither Sudan nor other African countries have established trimester-specific reference ranges for TSH, free T3 (FT3), and free T4 (FT4) in healthy pregnant women. This study aimed to establish trimester-specific reference ranges for TSH, FT3, and FT4 in healthy pregnant Sudanese women.

Results

We performed a longitudinal study, which included 63 women with singleton pregnancies who were followed since early pregnancy until the third trimester. The study was performed in Saad Abu-Alela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, during January to October 2014. An equal number of age- and parity-matched non-pregnant women were enrolled as a control group. Basic clinical and obstetrics data were gathered using questionnaires. TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels were measured. Median (5th–95th centile) values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 1.164 IU/ml (0.079–2.177 IU/ml), 4.639 nmol/l (3.843–6.562 nmol/l), and 16.86 pmol/l (13.02–31.48 pmol/l) in the first trimester. Median values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 1.364 IU/ml (0.540–2.521 IU/ml), 4.347 nmol/l (3.425–5.447 nmol/l), and 13.51 pmol/l (11.04–31.07 pmol/l) in the second trimester. These values were 1.445 IU/ml (0.588–2.460 IU/ml), 4.132 nmol/l (3.176–5.164 nmol/l), and 12.87 pmol/l (9.807–23.78 pmol/l) in the third trimester, respectively. TSH levels increased throughout the trimesters. FT3 and FT4 levels were significantly higher in the first trimester compared with the second and third trimesters. TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels were significantly lower in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study is the first to establish trimester-specific reference ranges of TSH, FT3, and FT4 in Sudanese women with normal pregnancies. Our results suggest that pregnancy is likely to suppress TSH, T3, and T4 levels in healthy women.

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Reference range
  • Sudan
  • Trimester
  • Thyroid

Background

Pregnancy may be associated with alterations in iodine homeostasis and other physiological changes that ultimately result in alteration of thyroid function [1, 2]. Several community-based cohort studies were conducted to establish trimester-specific reference ranges (TSRRs) for T3, T4, and TSH in different communities [3–10]. Studies have shown considerable variations in the thyroid hormone profile among populations of different origin, probably owing to modulatory effects of ethnicity [11], parity [12], body mass index (BMI) [13], iodine insufficiency [1, 2], and certain pregnancy-induced disorders [14, 15] of thyroid function. Establishing TSRRs of TSH, free T3 (FT3), and free T4 (FT4) are therefore crucial for meticulous evaluation of thyroid function during pregnancy. Maternal thyroid function should be maintained within normal limits, especially during the first trimester. In the first trimester, the embryo is completely dependent on the mother’s thyroid hormones for development of the brain [16], as well as other tissues [17, 18].

Many studies have been conducted worldwide to establish TSRRs in different countries [3–10]. However, similar studies in Sudan [19] and other African countries [20] are scarce. A previous study that assessed iodine status in 21 pregnant Sudanese women reported trimester-specific interquartile ranges of TSH, T3, and T4 [19]. However, the sample size was inadequate for establishing TSRRs for thyroid hormones in Sudan. A study in Nigeria evaluated the effect of iodine deficiency on thyroid function during pregnancy, and reported TSRRs of TSH, T3, and T4 based on a small sample size of 27 [20].

To the best of our knowledge, no other studies have been conducted to establish TSRRs for healthy pregnant women either in Sudan or in other African countries. The current study was conducted to establish TSRRs for healthy pregnant Sudanese women. Our findings are expected to assist in accurate interpretation of laboratory results, proper diagnosis, and management of thyroid dysfunction among Sudanese women during pregnancy.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal study in Saad Abu-Alela Hospital (Khartoum, Sudan) during January to October 2014. Women with a singleton pregnancy were enrolled early in pregnancy (once their pregnancy was confirmed) and followed until the third trimester. After patients signed an informed consent, the sociodemographic, medical, and obstetrics history (age, parity, gravidity, and gestational age) was recorded from each woman using a questionnaire. Pregnancy and its duration were confirmed by ultrasound, which was conducted by the practicing obstetricians (MAA and IA) as part of antenatal investigations. During the current longitudinal study, an equal number of non-pregnant women (pregnancy was excluded by ultrasound) matched for age and parity were included as controls. Pregnant and non-pregnant women who had a previous history of thyroid disease, hypertension, renal disease, diabetes, liver disease, and those on medication that might affect thyroid function were excluded from the study.

Blood pressure was measured using a sphygmomanometer for the case and control groups. During the first visit (in early pregnancy), maternal weight and height were measured. BMI was calculated and expressed as weight (kg)/height (m2). BMI during the first trimester is likely comparable with pre-conception BMI, which was difficult to get in our study population. Hemoglobin was measured for each patient at every visit.

A volume of 5 ml of venous blood was taken from each patient, allowed to clot, centrifuged, and stored at −20 °C until assay of thyroid hormones (TSH, FT3, FT4) using the immunoassay analyzer AIA 360 TOSOH (Japan), guided by the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously [15]. Noteworthy, the aim of present study was to get TSRRs of TSH, FT3 and FT4 regardless of parity or residence. Thus data were not dissected. The reference intervals for TSH, FT3, and FT4 for our laboratory were as follows: TSH, 0.38–4.3 IU/ml; FT3, 3.23–5.13 pmol/l; and FT4, 10.55–20.9 pmol/l.

A total required sample size of 63 women was calculated using a formula for a longitudinal study and the difference in the mean of the proposed variables (TSH, FT3, and FT4 as in our previous study [15]) that would provide 80 % power to detect a 5 % difference at α = 0.05. We assumed that 10 % of women will be lost during follow-up or will not respond.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into a computer using SPSS for Windows (version 16.0). The 5th–95th centile and median were calculated for levels of TSH, FT3, and FT4. Levels of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were not normally distributed (assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test), and differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test (Mann–Whitney U test between two groups). A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Among 75 pregnant women who were initially enrolled, 63 (84.0 %) completed the follow-up until the third trimester. The rest (16.0 %) of the patients were lost during follow-up because of a change in address.

Approximately half of these women were primiparous (n = 34.0, 54.0 %), the majority were housewives (n = 45, 71.4 %), and few of them had a rural residence (n = 9, 14.3 %). Hemoglobin level and the other basic characteristics of the women are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Mean (SD) of the characteristics of the enrolled pregnant women (n = 63)

Variable

Mean (SD)

Age, years

27.0 (4.9)

Parity

0.8 (1.1)

Gravidity

2.5 (4.0)

Body mass index

27.9 (5.4)

Gestational age, weeks

 First trimester

10.8 (2.9)

 Second trimester

21.5 (4.0)

 Third trimester

31.2 (3.4)

Hemoglobin, gm/dl

 First trimester

10.6 (1.0)

 Second trimester

10.6 (0.6)

 Third trimester

10.9 (1.1)

TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels were significantly lower in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women (Table 2). Median (5th–95th centile) values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 in pregnant women were 1.164 IU/ml (0.079–2.177 IU/ml), 4.639 nmol/l (3.843–6.562 nmol/l), and 16.86 pmol/l (13.02–31.48 pmol/l) in the first trimester. Median values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 1.364 IU/ml (0.540–2.521 IU/ml), 4.347 nmol/l (3.425–5.447 nmol/l), and 13.51 pmol/l (11.04–31.07 pmol/l) in the second trimester. These values were 1.445 IU/ml (0.588–2.460 IU/ml), 4.132 nmol/l (3.176–5.164 nmol/l), and 12.87 pmol/l (9.807–23.78 pmol/l) in the third trimester, respectively.
Table 2

Median (5th–95th centile) values of thyroid hormones in pregnant and non-pregnant Sudanese women

Variable

Non- pregnant

Trimester-I

Trimester-II

Trimester-III

P

Mean = 10.8 weeks

Mean =21.5 weeks

Mean =31.2 weeks

TSH, IU/ml

2.080 (0.776–4.550)

1.164 (0.079–2.177)

1.364 (0.540–2.521)

1.445 (0.588–2.460)

Non- Pregnant vs. Pregnant P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-II P = 0.042

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-III P = 0.007

Trimester-II vs. Trimester-III P = 0.482

Free T3, pmol/l

5.176 (4.156–6.095)

4.639 (3.843–6.562)

4.347 (3.425–5.447)

4.132 (3.176–5.164)

Non- Pregnant vs. Pregnant P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-II P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-III P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-III P = 0.064

Free T4, pmol/l

16.34 (12.6–19.9)

16.86 (13.02–31.48)

13.51 (11.04–31.07)

12.87 (9.807–23.78)

Non- Pregnant vs. Pregnant P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-II P = 0.008

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-III P < 0.001

Trimester-I vs. Trimester-III P =0.078

TSH levels increased over the trimesters, with significantly higher TSH levels in the second and third trimesters compared with the first trimester (Table 2, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Distribution of TSH levels among controls and different trimesters in pregnant women

FT3 levels were significantly higher in the first trimester compared with the second and third trimesters. However, no significant difference was observed in FT3 levels between the second and third trimesters (Table 2 and Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Distribution of T3 levels among controls and different trimesters in pregnant women

FT4 levels showed significant variation between the first and second trimesters, as well as between the first and third trimesters. FT4 levels were lowest during the third trimester. No significant difference in FT4 levels was observed between the second and third trimesters (Table 2 and Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Distribution of T4 among controls and different trimesters in pregnant women

Discussion

The present study is the first to establish TSRRs of TSH, FT3, and FT4 in healthy Sudanese pregnant women. A previous study by Eltom et al. assessed iodine status during pregnancy in Sudan [19]. They observed comparable trimester-specific TSH levels, but lower T3 and T4 interquartile ranges, compared with our results (Table 3). They evaluated 21 pregnant Sudanese women, which was an inadequate sample size to establish TSRRs for thyroid hormones in Sudan. Similar to the present findings, they found that TSRRs of T3 and T4 were lowest in the third trimester. In contrast, maximum TSH levels were reported in the second trimester [19]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies on TSRRs for healthy pregnant women in any of the African countries. A previous Nigerian study examined the effect of iodine deficiency on thyroid function during pregnancy [20]. TSRRs of TSH, T3, and T4 were calculated after evaluating 27 African women with a normal pregnancy [20]. As shown in Table 4, TSRRs of TSH in all trimesters were higher in the Nigerian study compared with the current study on pregnant Sudanese women. In contrast, thyroid hormone levels were higher in pregnant Sudanese women, especially T4, compared with Nigerian women. TSRRs of TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels in pregnant Sudanese women showed a unique trend compared with previous studies in other countries. TSRRs of TSH in Sudanese are comparable with some Western countries (Table 4) [3, 4], but relatively lower compared with some Arab [5], Persian [6], and Eastern countries [7, 8]. TSRRs of T4, and to some extent T3, are higher in Sudanese women compared with other countries (Table 4) [3–10].
Table 3

Comparison of interquartile ranges of thyroid hormones between our study and a previous Sudanese report

  

Trimester I

Trimester II

Trimester III

Present study

TSH, IU/ml

0.6–1.6

0.9–1.7

1.0–1.8

T3, nmol/L

4.4–5.3

3.9–4.7

3.7–4.5

T4, pmol/L

15.1–21.4

12.3–17.8

11.5–16.4

Eltom et al. [19].

TSH, IU/ml

0.5–1.5

0.7–1.8

0.6–1.6

T3, nmol/L

2.1–3.2

2.2–3.5

2.2–2.9

T4, pmol/L

9.6–13.4

8.6–10.8

9.4–12.6

Table 4

Comparison of thyroid hormones between our study from Sudan and previous reports from other countries

 

Percentile used

TFT

Non-pregnant

Trimester I

Trimester II

Trimester III

Sudan

5–95

TSH, IU/ml

0.78–4.55

0.08–2.18

0.54–2.52

0.59–2.46

T3, nmol/L

4.16–6.10

3.84–6.56

3.43–5.45

3.18–5.16

T4, pmol/L

12.6–20.0

13.00–31.53

11.07–31.2

9.78–23.81

Nigeria [20]

5–95

TSH, IU/ml

–

0.5–5.0

0.5–5.0

0.5–5.0

T3, nmol/L

–

1.7–3.5

1.86–3.54

1.9–3.94

T4, pmol/L

–

6.1–19.7

8.5–23.3

8.9–23.3

UAE [5]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

0.21–6.9

0.17–5.9

0.04–9.3

0.3–4.32

T3, nmol/L

–

–

–

–

T4, pmol/L

8–18

8.4–19.3

8.9–24.6

9.8–18.6

Iran [6]

5–95

TSH, IU/ml

–

0.2–3.9

0.5–4.1

0.6–4.1

T3, nmol/L

–

–

–

–

T4, pmol/L

–

8.5–19

9.7–21

8.7–20.4.

Turkey [9]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

0.47–4.70

0.49–2.33

0.51–3.44

0.58–4.31

T3, nmol/L

2.96–5.48

3.80–5.81

3.69–5.90

3.67–5.81

T4, pmol/L

10.68–18.23

10.30–18.11

10.30–18.15

10.30–17.89

Switzerland [3]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

0.35–4.94

0.06–2.83

0.20–2.79

0.31–2.90

T3, nmol/L

–

3.52–6.22

3.41–5.78

3.33–5.59

T4, pmol/L

9–19.1

10.5–18.3

9.5–15.7

8.6–13.6

Spain [10]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

–

0.10–2.65

0.12–2.64

0.23–3.56

T3, nmol/L

–

3.44–6.80

3.79–6.42

3.46–6.39

T4, pmol/L

–

10.61–17.76

9.1–14.67

8.49–15.6

India [7]

5–95

TSH, IU/ml

–

0.6–5.0

0.43–5.78

0.74–5.7

T3, nmol/L

–

1.92–5.86

3.2–5.7

3.3–5.18

T4, pmol/L

–

12.0–19.45

9.48–19.58

11.3–17.71

China [8]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

0.54–4.20

0.16–3.78

0.34–3.51

0.34–4.32

T3, nmol/L

–

2.9–5.0

2.9–4.6

2.9–4.5

T4, pmol/L

9.2–16.9

10.9–17.7

9.3–15.2

7.9–14.1

USA [4]

2.5–97.5

TSH, IU/ml

–

0.24–2.99

0.46–2.95

0.43–2.78

T3, nmol/L

–

–

–

–

T4, pmol/L

–

–

–

–

TSH and thyroid hormones show day/night [21] and seasonal variation [22, 23]. These hormones are also affected by iodine intake [23] and excretion [24], ambient temperature [25], luminosity and other ecological/genetic factors [26–28]. These biological and environmental factors are unlikely to be comparable worldwide, which could explain the variation in TSRRs of TSH, T3, and T4 in different countries. The variation in TSRRs can also be explained by variable accuracy of the techniques used for thyroid hormonal assays [29, 30] and a lack of standardized preanalytical conditions (i.e., procedure and timing of blood sampling) [31, 32]. Ideally, blood samples for thyroid hormone assays should be collected without the aid of a tourniquet from a rested individual in the fasting state [30]. Blood samples should be taken at the same hour of the day to avoid the effect of circadian rhythm on TSH, T3, and T4 [21].

Table 4 shows that levels of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were lower in pregnant women compared with the control group. In our study, a maximum decrease in thyroid function was achieved in the second trimester, with no significant change in thyroid hormone levels up to the end of pregnancy. In a Turkish study, TSH levels of pregnant women were significantly lower than those of non-pregnant controls in the first trimester [9] (Table 4). However, TSH levels were comparable with non-pregnant levels in the second trimester, and higher than non-pregnant levels in the third trimester. This Turkish study also showed that FT3 and FT4 levels were comparable in the three trimesters [9]. Additionally, T3 levels were higher throughout pregnancy, but T4 levels were lower in the second and third trimesters compared with non-pregnant controls. Chinese pregnant women showed a similar pattern of trimester-specific TSH changes that were observed in Turkish women, but FT4 and FT3 levels decreased as pregnancy progressed [8] (Table 4). A previous study that examined pregnant women with different ethnicities in the United Arab Emirates showed that lower TSH levels in the first trimester increased to non-pregnant control levels in the third trimester [5]. Additionally, FT4 showed a steady decrease throughout pregnancy (Table 4). The findings of the United Arab Emirates study were reproduced in another two studies that intended to establish TSRRs of thyroid hormones in Korean [33] and Irish [34] women.

The physiological basis of the pattern of changes in TSH, FT3, and FT4 during pregnancy has been extensively studied towards the end of the last century [35, 36]. Most previous studies attributed variations in the levels of thyroid hormones throughout pregnancy to non-pituitary hormonal control mechanisms [37]. Researchers have hypothesized that human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) hormone can stimulate TSH receptors, with subsequent release of T3 and T4 from follicular thyroid cells during the first trimester [38]. Thyroid hormones negatively feedback on the pituitary gland and thus decrease TSH levels [39]. High estrogen levels induced by hCG may markedly decrease free T3 and T4 levels by increasing their transport proteins. As a result, TSH is expected to increase, contradicting the thyrotropic action of hCG [40]. These contradictory actions of hCG on TSH levels suggest that the hypothesis that attributes the second and third trimester TSH surge to hCG withdrawal is questionable [41, 42]. The current study and at least two other studies showed a significant decrease in TSH levels in the second trimester, but were not able to explain this finding [43, 44]. Notably, a concurrent decrease in TSH levels with FT3 and FT4 levels excludes iodine insufficiency as a probable cause of decreased thyroid hormones in the Sudanese pregnant women in our study. This is because, in such conditions, TSH is expected to increase as a compensatory mechanism for decreased T3 and T4 levels. To the best of our knowledge, a further decrease in TSH levels in the second trimester is unclear and may preclude hCG withdrawal as a probable explanation for low hCG levels in the first trimester.

Notably, TSRRs that were established in the present study were derived by following up Sudanese women with a normal pregnancy throughout the three trimesters. Our study design avoids between-individual variation as a possible confounder for the apparent differences in TSRRs of TSH, T3, and T4 demonstrated in this study. However, within-individual variation (e.g., seasonal variation) [22, 23] of TSH and thyroid hormones remains a possible bias for the current findings. Another limitation of this study is that we did not evaluate iodine homeostasis in pregnant women. However, a simultaneous decrease in TSH and thyroid hormones exclude iodine insufficiency as a probable explanation of hypothyroid function in pregnant women in our study. This is because in such conditions, decreased T3 and T4 levels are expected to feedback positively on TSH and increase its level. Evaluation of urine iodine concentrations in future studies may provide further verification of this hypothesis.

Conclusions

The present study is the first to establish TSRRs of TSH, FT3, and FT4 in Sudan. Pregnancy is likely to suppress TSH, T3, and T4 levels in Sudanese women. TSRRs of TSH in Sudan are comparable with some Western countries, but are relatively lower compared with some Arab, Persian, and Eastern countries. However, TSRRs of thyroid hormones are higher in Sudan compared with other countries. Further research that also considers iodine homeostasis in pregnant women may provide further support for the conclusions of the present study.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

FT3: 

Free triiodothyronine

FT4: 

Free tetraiodothyronine

hCG: 

Human chorionic gonadotropin

T3: 

Triiodothyronine

T4: 

Tetraiodothyronine

TSH: 

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

TSRRs: 

Trimester-specific reference ranges

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank pregnant women in Saad Abu-Alela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, for their assistance with obtaining the data used in this study.

Funding

None to declare.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

IA designed the study. ETE and MAA carried out experimental protocols. IA and MFL analyzed the data. MFL and IA prepared and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Department of Obstetrics and Genecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum. All enrolled patients signed a written consent form before they joined the study groups.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Gezira University, Wad Madani, Sudan
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
(3)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Alneelain University, Khartoum, Sudan

References

  1. Medici M, Korevaar TI, Visser WE, Visser TJ, Peeters RP. Thyroid function in pregnancy: What is normal? Clin Chem. 2015;61(5):704–13. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.236646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lazarus JH. Thyroid function in pregnancy. Br Med Bull. 2011;97:137–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stricker RT, Echenard M, Eberhart R, Chevailler MC, Perez V, Quinn FA, et al. Evaluation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy: the importance of using gestational age-specific reference intervals. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157:509–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Soldin OP, Soldin D, Sastoque M. Gestation-specific thyroxine and thyroid stimulating hormone levels in the United States and worldwide. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29(5):553–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhatt GS, Jayasundaram R, Warethc LA, Krishnasamy Jayasundaram NN, Darwish EA, Lewis A. Thyrotrophin and free thyroxine trimester-specific reference intervals in a mixed ethnic pregnant population in the United Arab Emirates. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;370:147–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Azizi F, Mehran L, Amouzegar A, Delshad H, Tohidi M, Askari S, Hedayati M. Establishment of the trimester-specific reference range for free thyroxine index. Thyroid. 2013;23(3):354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marwaha RK, Chopra S, Gopalakrishnan S, Sharma B, Kanwar RS, Sastry A, Singh S. Establishment of reference range for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Indian women. BJOG. 2008;115(5):602–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shen FX, Xie ZW, Shi-Ming Lu SM, Tar-Choon Aw TC, Zhu B. Gestational thyroid reference intervals in antibody-negative Chinese women. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:673–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Akarsu S, Akbiyik F, Karaismailoglu E, Dikmen ZG. Gestation specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in pregnancy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0569. [Epub ahead of print].
  10. Bocos-Terraz JP, Izquierdo-Álvarez S, Bancalero-Flores JL, Álvarez-Lahuerta R, Aznar-Sauca A, Real-López E, Ibáñez-Marco R, Bocanegra-García V, Rivera-Sánchez G. Thyroid hormones according to gestational age in pregnant Spanish women. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:237. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-2-237.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. McLeod DS, Cooper DS, Ladenson PW, Whiteman DC, Jordan SJ. Race/ethnicity and the prevalence of thyrotoxicosis in young Americans. Thyroid. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  12. Ryckman KK, Spracklen CN, Dagle JM, Murray JC. Maternal factors and complications of preterm birth associated with neonatal thyroid stimulating hormone. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014;27(9–10):929–38.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Solanki A, Bansal S, Jindal S, Saxena V, Shukla US. Relationship of serum thyroid stimulating hormone with body mass index in healthy adults. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17 Suppl 1:S167–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ali AA, Okud A, Khojali A, Adam I. High incidence of obstetric complications in Kassala Hospital, Eastern Sudan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(2):148–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elhaj ET, Adam I, Alim A, Elhassan EM, Lutfi MF. Thyroid function/antibodies in Sudanese patients with preeclampsia. Front Endocrinol. 2015;6:87. doi:10.3389/fendo.2015.00087.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, van Wely M, van der Post JA, Goddijn M, Bisschop PH. Significance of (sub) clinical thyroid dysfunction a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):605–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boas M, Forman JL, Juul A, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Skakkebaek NE, Hilsted L, Chellakooty M, Larsen T, Larsen JF, Petersen JH, Main KM. Narrow intra-individual variation of maternal thyroid function in pregnancy based on a longitudinal study on 132 women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(6):903–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarkar D. Recurrent pregnancy loss in patients with thyroid dysfunction. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16 Suppl 2:S350–1.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Eltom A, Elnagar B, Elbagir M, et al. Thyroglobulin in serum as an indicator of iodine status during pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2000;60:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Das SC, Isichei UP, Mohammed AZ, Otokwula AA, Emokpae A. Impact of iodine deficiency on thyroid function in pregnant African women — A possible factor in the genesis of “small for dates” babies. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2005;20(2):35–42. doi:10.1007/BF02867398.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Parker DC, Pekary AE, Hershman JM. Effect of normal and reversed sleep-wake cycles upon noctohemeral rhythmicity of plasma thyrotropin: evidence suggestive of an inhibitory influence in sleep. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;43:318–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine M, Duffy L, Moore DC, Matej LA. Acclimation of a non-indigenous sub-Arctic population: seasonal variation in thyroid function in interior Alaska. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1995;111:209–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ford HC, Johnson LA, Feek CM. Newton JD Iodine intake and the seasonal incidence of thyrotoxicosis in New Zealand. Clin Endocrinol. 1991;34:179–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasmussen LB, Ovesen L, Bülow I, Jørgensen T, Knudsen N, Laurberg P, Perrild H. Dietary iodine intake and urinary iodine excretion in a Danish population: effect of geography, supplements and food choice. Br J Nutri. 2002;87:61–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Leppaluoto J, Sikkila K, Hassi J. Seasonal variation of serum TSH and thyroid hormones in males living in subarctic environmental conditions. Int J Circumpolar Health. 1998;57:383–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vestergaard P. Smoking and thyroid disorders: a meta analysis. Euro J Endocrinol. 2002;146:153–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Surks MI, Sievert R. Drugs and thyroid function. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1688–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Panicker V. Genetics of thyroid function and disease. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011;32(4):165–75.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Martel J, Despres N, Ahnadi CE, et al. Comparative multicentre study of a panel of thyroid tests using different automated immunoassay platforms and specimens at high risk of antibody interference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38:785–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Andersen S, Bruun NH, Pedersen KM, Laurberg P. Biologic variation is important for interpretation of thyroid function tests. Thyroid. 2003;13(11):1069–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Petersen PH, Blaabjerg O, Hørder M. Long–term variability in serum thyroglobulin and thyroid related hormones in healthy subjects. Acta Endocrinol. 1980;95:328–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Weeke J, Gundersen HJG. Circadian and 30 minutes variations in serum TSH and thyroid hormones in normal subjects. Acta Endocrinol. 1978;89:659–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moon H-W, Chung H-J, Park C-M, Hur M, Yun Y-M. Establishment of trimester-specific reference intervals for thyroid hormones in Korean pregnant women. Ann Lab Med. 2015;35(2):198–204. doi:10.3343/alm.2015.35.2.198.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Khalid AS, Marchocki Z, Hayes K, Lutomski JE, Joyce C, Stapleton M, et al. Establishing trimester-specific maternal thyroid function reference intervals. Ann Clin Biochem. 2014;51(Pt 2):277–83. doi:10.1177/0004563213496394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pekary AE, Jackson IM, Goodwin TM, Pang X-P, Hein MD, Hershman JM. Increased in vitro thyrotropic activity of partially sialated human chorionic gonadotropin extracted from hydatidiform moles of patients with hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:70–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Glinoer D, De Nayer P, Robyn C, Lejeune B, Kinthaert J, Meuris S. Serum levels of intact human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and its free α and β subunits, in relation to maternal thyroid stimulation during normal pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest. 1993;16:881–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ballabio M, Poshyachinda M, Ekins RP. Pregnancy-induced changes in thyroid function: role of human chorionic gonadotropin as putative regulator of maternal thyroid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:824–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Glinoer D. The regulation of thyroid function in pregnancy: pathways of endocrine adaptation from physiology to pathology. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:404–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Glinoer D. What happens to the normal thyroid during pregnancy? Thyroid. 1999;9:631–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Carayon P, Lefort G, Nisula B. Interaction of human chorionic gonadotropin and human luteinizing hormone with human thyroid membranes. Endocrinology. 1980;106(6):1907–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedersen KM, Laurberg P, Iversen E, Knudsen PR, Gregersen HE, Rasmussen OS, Larsen KR, Eriksen GM, Johannesen PL. Amelioration of some pregnancy-associated variations in thyroid function induced by iodine supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:1078–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Berghout A, Endert E, Ross A, Hogerzeil HV, Smits NJ, Wiersinga WM. Thyroid function and thyroid size in normal pregnant women living in an iodine replete area. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;41:375–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Fisher DA, Hobel CJ, Garza R, Pierce CA. Thyroid function in the preterm fetus. Pediatrics. 1970;46:208–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lemarchand-Beraud T, Vannotti A. Relationships between blood thyrotrophin level, protein bound iodine and free thyroxine concentration in man under physiological conditions. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1969;60:315–26.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement

BMC Physiology

ISSN: 1472-6793

Contact us